Jump to the latest
Lawsuit UpdateCase tracker

Case tracker · Updated monthly

Roundup lawsuit update: October 2026

Where the $7.25 billion class settlement, the Supreme Court's Durnell ruling and the federal MDL stand, with a dated timeline.

Verified

Read the short answerDocket numbers

Roundup (glyphosate) federal MDL

MDL No. 2741

1,104 pending

Roundup lawsuit update

Pending federal cases from the JPML report, October 2026.

Where things stand

TL;DR

The firms

As of late October 2026, no court has given final approval to Bayer's $7.25 billion Roundup class settlement. The fairness hearing was Sept. 14, 2026. In June, the Supreme Court ruled that federal law blocks failure-to-warn label claims, but it did not address design-defect claims. The federal MDL had 1,104 pending cases on Oct. 1, 2026.

  • The Supreme Court decided Monsanto v. Durnell 7-2 on June 25, 2026. Federal law (FIFRA) preempts state claims that would require a cancer warning on the Roundup label.
  • Monsanto's proposed class settlement is worth up to $7.25 billion over up to 21 years. A St. Louis judge held the fairness hearing Sept. 14, 2026. No final ruling was reported as of mid-October.
  • Opt-outs and objections closed on June 4, 2026.
  • Federal MDL 2741 had 1,104 pending cases and 5,324 total cases as of Oct. 1, 2026.
  • A St. Louis trial on design-defect claims began Sept. 29, 2026, per a plaintiff-firm tracker.

Docket board

Roundup (glyphosate) federal MDL

MDL no.
MDL No. 2741
Court
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Assigned judge
Hon. Vince Chhabria
Cases pending
1,104 (dated October 1, 2026)
Coming up
Final approval ruling on the class settlement in St. Louis (no date set)
Latest status
5,324 total actions filed over the life of the MDL; class settlement pending in Missouri state court

Numbers sourced from

Firms handling these cases

Firms that advertise Roundup cases. Firms are ranked by our editorial read of fit for Roundup cases. Check the table for each firm's MDL role or trial work.
LawyersFits cases likeOpenedBasedCourt leadership postsFee
1 Schmidt & Clark, LLPPeople anywhere in the U.S. diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma after Roundup use; free 24/7 case review2005Washington, DCNo court posts in public recordsFree case review; phone line open 24/7
2 Wisner BaumRoundup cases; the firm tried the first Roundup cancer trial (Johnson, 2018) and the Pilliod case (2019)Not shownLos Angeles, CaliforniaCo-lead, baby food MDL 3101; Steering committee, Zantac MDL 2924Contingency ("No Fees Unless We Win")
3 Weitz & LuxenbergRoundup cases; the firm served as co-lead counsel in the federal Roundup MDL1986New York, New YorkCo-lead, Roundup MDL 2741; Steering committee, hair relaxer MDL 3060Free case evaluation; fee terms not posted
4 Beasley AllenNew Roundup cases; the firm said in March 2026 it was actively reviewing new Roundup cancer cases1979Montgomery, AlabamaCo-lead, ARC airbag MDL 3051; Executive committee, hair relaxer MDL 3060; Steering committee, ZF-TRW airbag MDLContingency ("No Win, No Fee or Case Costs")

Firm profiles

Schmidt & Clark, LLP

Fits cases like: People anywhere in the U.S. diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma after Roundup use; free 24/7 case review

Schmidt & Clark represents injured people in individual cases from every part of the U.S. Most of its work is mass torts, including defective products, medical devices, dangerous drugs and toxic exposure.

Schmidt & Clark advertises Roundup cases. Ask whether your case would stay with the firm or go to co-counsel, which is common in mass torts.

Based
Washington, DC
Opened
2005
Fee
Free case review; phone line open 24/7
Case types it promotes
Roundup; hair relaxer; airbags; pressure cookers; other defective products

Peer recognition

  • The firm says Best Lawyers put it on the 2026 "Best Law Firms" list. Cite
  • The Texas Board of Legal Specialization lists partner C.L. Mike Schmidt as board-certified in both Civil Trial Law and Personal Injury Trial Law. The National Board of Trial Advocacy lists him as certified in Civil Trial. Cite
  • The firm reports 19 straight years of Super Lawyers selection. Cite

Before you call

  • Its website lists no individual verdict or settlement figures. Ask what it has recovered in cases like yours.
  • Find out if the firm would keep your case or send it to co-counsel. Mass tort firms often work with co-counsel.

Site: schmidtandclark.com

Wisner Baum

Fits cases like: Roundup cases; the firm tried the first Roundup cancer trial (Johnson, 2018) and the Pilliod case (2019)

Wisner Baum, called Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman until January 2023, is a trial firm in Los Angeles. It tried the first Roundup cancer cases against Monsanto.

Based
Los Angeles, California
Fee
Contingency ("No Fees Unless We Win")
Case types it promotes
Roundup and other herbicides; paraquat

Court posts

  • In May 2024, R. Brent Wisner became co-lead counsel in the baby food heavy metals MDL (MDL 3101) in the N.D. Cal. Cite
  • In May 2020, R. Brent Wisner joined the plaintiffs' steering committee of the Zantac MDL (MDL 2924) in the S.D. Fla. Cite

Reported wins

  • Johnson v. Monsanto (2018): the first Roundup trial ended with a $289.2 million California jury award. The award was cut to $78.5 million. Cite
  • Pilliod v. Monsanto (2019): the jury returned $2.055 billion, which was reduced to $87 million. In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court turned down Monsanto's appeal. Cite

Before you call

  • Its public case pages cover herbicides, drugs and devices. Ask first if your case involves another kind of product.

Site: wisnerbaum.com

Weitz & Luxenberg

Fits cases like: Roundup cases; the firm served as co-lead counsel in the federal Roundup MDL

Weitz & Luxenberg is a mass-tort firm in New York that got its start in asbestos cases. It served as co-lead counsel in the federal Roundup MDL and holds a seat on the hair relaxer MDL steering committee.

Weitz & Luxenberg says it was not counsel in, and did not help negotiate, the 2026 class settlement.

Based
New York, New York
Opened
1986
Fee
Free case evaluation; fee terms not posted
Case types it promotes
hair relaxer; Roundup; paraquat; talc; consumer products

Court posts

  • In the Roundup MDL (MDL 2741, N.D. Cal.), Robin Greenwald was one of the plaintiffs' co-lead counsel. Cite
  • In March 2023, EricaRae Garcia was named to the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee in MDL 3060, the hair relaxer MDL in the N.D. Ill. Cite

Reported wins

  • The firm took part in Monsanto's June 2020 Roundup settlement, which covered nearly 100,000 claimants. Cite
  • The firm reports a $190 million asbestos verdict from 2013. Cite

Before you call

  • Weitz & Luxenberg says it did not serve as counsel in Bayer's proposed 2026 Roundup class settlement.

Site: weitzlux.com

Beasley Allen

Fits cases like: New Roundup cases; the firm said in March 2026 it was actively reviewing new Roundup cancer cases

Former Lt. Gov. Jere Beasley founded this Alabama plaintiffs' firm in 1979. Its lawyers share the lead in the ARC airbag MDL and hold a seat on the hair relaxer MDL executive committee. Auto-defect suits have been part of its work for decades.

Based
Montgomery, Alabama
Opened
1979
Fee
Contingency ("No Win, No Fee or Case Costs")
Case types it promotes
hair relaxer; Roundup; airbags (ARC and ZF-TRW)

Court posts

  • In March 2023, Demet Basar was named co-lead counsel in MDL 3051, the ARC airbag inflator MDL in the N.D. Ga. Cite
  • Navan Ward holds a seat on the Plaintiffs' Executive Committee in MDL 3060, the hair relaxer MDL. Cite
  • Dee Miles was named to the plaintiffs' steering committee in the ZF-TRW airbag control unit MDL in the C.D. Cal. Cite

Reported wins

  • The firm reports a $162 million settlement tied to a 2021 van crash in which the van had the wrong load-range tires. Cite

Before you call

  • In March 2026, Beasley Allen said it was still reviewing new Roundup cases.

Site: beasleyallen.com

Each win above comes from the firm's own reports or from court records. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

This month in brief

Roundup lawsuits claim that glyphosate, the weed killer’s active ingredient, caused non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Monsanto makes Roundup. Bayer owns Monsanto.

Three facts shape the litigation in October 2026:

  1. A class settlement is waiting for a final ruling. Monsanto proposed a nationwide class deal worth up to $7.25 billion. A St. Louis judge held the fairness hearing on Sept. 14, 2026. No ruling had been reported as of mid-October, according to a plaintiff-firm tracker.
  2. The Supreme Court narrowed label claims. In Monsanto Co. v. Durnell, the Court held that federal law blocks state failure-to-warn claims seeking a cancer warning on the Roundup label.
  3. Design-defect claims continue. A St. Louis jury began hearing a design-defect trial on Sept. 29, 2026.

Timeline of key dates

Date What happened
Mar. 21, 2025 A Georgia jury awarded John Barnes nearly $2.1 billion ($65 million compensatory plus $2 billion punitive). Monsanto said it would appeal.
Feb. 17, 2026 Monsanto filed a proposed nationwide class settlement of up to $7.25 billion in St. Louis.
Mar. 4, 2026 Judge Timothy Boyer granted preliminary approval and ordered a $500 million initial deposit.
May 2026 Objectors moved the case to federal court. MDL Judge Vince Chhabria questioned parts of the deal but declined to block it (plaintiff-firm tracker).
June 4, 2026 Deadline to opt out of or object to the class settlement.
June 17, 2026 Judge Henry Autrey (E.D. Mo.) sent the settlement case back to St. Louis state court.
June 25, 2026 The Supreme Court decided Monsanto Co. v. Durnell, 7-2.
Aug. 27, 2026 The Eighth Circuit dismissed the objectors’ appeal, according to Bayer’s own statement.
Sept. 14, 2026 The court held its final-approval hearing. About 135 objectors were heard (plaintiff-firm tracker).
Sept. 29, 2026 A design-defect trial began in St. Louis (plaintiff-firm tracker).
Oct. 1, 2026 MDL 2741 had 1,104 pending cases, per the JPML.
Mid-Oct. 2026 No final approval ruling reported (plaintiff-firm tracker).

The Durnell ruling and what it left open

The Supreme Court decided Monsanto Co. v. Durnell, No. 24-1068, on June 25, 2026. Justice Kavanaugh wrote for a 7-2 majority. Justice Jackson dissented, joined by Justice Gorsuch.

The Court held that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) expressly preempts certain state claims. These are failure-to-warn claims that would require a cancer warning on an EPA-approved Roundup label. The ruling overturned a Missouri jury verdict worth more than $1 million.

The ruling did not address design-defect claims. A design-defect claim says the product itself was unreasonably dangerous, whatever the label said.

Bayer says Durnell should lead to dismissal of current warning-based claims and stop future ones. That is Bayer’s own statement, not the Court’s words.

Inside the $7.25 billion class deal

Monsanto filed the proposed settlement in St. Louis on Feb. 17, 2026. At the time, Bayer faced about 65,000 plaintiffs. Key terms, as reported by Fox Business:

Term What it says
Total Up to $7.25 billion
Payment period Capped annual payments over up to 21 years
Who is covered People exposed before mid-February 2026 who are diagnosed with NHL now or within 16 years of approval
Withdrawal Bayer may walk away if opt-outs pass a set level
Class counsel fees $675 million requested, 9.3% of the fund (plaintiff-firm tracker)

Judge Timothy Boyer of the 22nd Judicial Circuit granted preliminary approval on March 4, 2026. He ordered a $500 million initial deposit and set the June 4 opt-out deadline.

Objectors then moved the case to federal court. On June 17, 2026, Judge Henry Autrey sent it back. He ruled that objectors are not defendants who can remove a case. Bayer reports that the Eighth Circuit dismissed the objectors’ appeal on Aug. 27, 2026. That comes only from Bayer’s statement.

In May 2026, Judge Chhabria, who runs the federal MDL, questioned whether the deal can bind out-of-state users and people not yet diagnosed. He declined to block it, according to a plaintiff-firm tracker.

No final approval ruling had been reported as of mid-October 2026. The final opt-out count has not been published. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

The federal MDL and the St. Louis trial

The federal cases sit in In re Roundup Products Liability Litigation, MDL 2741. Judge Vince Chhabria presides in the Northern District of California. As of Oct. 1, 2026, the MDL had 1,104 pending cases. A total of 5,324 cases have been part of it over time.

In St. Louis, a trial on design-defect theories began on Sept. 29, 2026. Three women with NHL who are outside the class brought the claims. No verdict had been reported as of Oct. 7, 2026, according to a plaintiff-firm tracker. We will report the outcome in next month’s check.

If you were diagnosed with NHL now

Your options depend on when you were exposed and what you did before June 4, 2026. This is general information, not legal advice.

  • Exposed before mid-February 2026: If approved, the class settlement covers people like you who are diagnosed now or within 16 years of approval. The opt-out deadline has passed.
  • Exposed only after mid-February 2026: The class definition, as reported, does not reach you. Ask a lawyer what claims you may still have.
  • Already opted out: Opting out generally means you keep your own claim. After Durnell, a claim based only on the missing label warning faces a federal bar. Design-defect claims were not addressed.

Write down when, where and how often you used Roundup. Keep your diagnosis date and medical records. Filing windows differ by state, so ask a lawyer how long you have.

For the other lawsuits we track, see the October 2026 overview. For a related cancer case type, see the hair relaxer lawsuit update.

What readers ask us

Is the Roundup settlement final?

No. Judge Timothy Boyer granted preliminary approval on March 4, 2026, and held the fairness hearing on Sept. 14, 2026. A plaintiff-firm tracker showed no final approval ruling as of mid-October 2026.

Can I still opt out of the Roundup class settlement?

The court set June 4, 2026 as the deadline to opt out or object. That date has passed. Talk to a lawyer about your situation and your state's deadline.

Did the Supreme Court end Roundup lawsuits?

No. Durnell blocks state failure-to-warn claims that would require a cancer warning on an EPA-approved label. The ruling did not address other theories, such as design defect. Bayer says the decision should end warning-based claims; that is Bayer's own view.

Who does the class settlement cover?

It covers people exposed to Roundup before mid-February 2026 who are diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma now or within 16 years of approval. Payments are capped each year and run up to 21 years. Bayer keeps the right to withdraw if too many people opt out.

What was the largest recent Roundup verdict?

On March 21, 2025, a Georgia jury awarded John Barnes nearly $2.1 billion. Monsanto said it would appeal. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Source log

  1. JPML: Pending MDL dockets by actions pending (as of Oct. 1, 2026)
  2. Dechert: Supreme Court rules FIFRA preempts state failure-to-warn claims (June 2026)
  3. Bayer (party statement): Monsanto wins Roundup case at U.S. Supreme Court (June 2026)
  4. Fox Business: Bayer proposes $7.25B plan to settle Roundup cancer lawsuits (Feb. 2026)
  5. Claims Journal: Judge grants preliminary approval of Roundup settlement (Mar. 5, 2026)
  6. The Missouri Times: Federal judge returns Roundup settlement to state court (June 2026)
  7. Bayer (party statement): Eighth Circuit decision on objectors' appeal (Aug. 2026)
  8. Lawsuit Information Center (plaintiff-firm tracker): Roundup lawsuit status (as of mid-Oct. 2026)
  9. FOX 5 Atlanta: Jury awards Georgia man in Roundup lawsuit (Mar. 2025)
  10. Beasley Allen: Jere Beasley Report, March 2026
  11. Weitz & Luxenberg: Bayer announces Roundup settlement proposal (2026)